It has become a rather routine affair now. A few terrorists sneak into Kashmir from Pakistan aided by their army and terrorist groups. They then kill civilians, army and police personnel, loot money and burn schools and buildings. Most of them die in the ensuing security operations though some manage to escape. Pakistan never acknowledges it sponsored the terrorists and that they are its citizens. Then there is lull for a few weeks before the whole sequence repeats.
Anyone who has been following the news will know what I mean. There is a sickening regularity to it. Pakistan continues to behave like a petulant child that will not listen to anyone. Pakistan is like the typical villain in Indian movies - having lost everthing and having been proved wrong, the villain's only wish is to somehow kill the hero. Pakistan's raison d' etre for existence as a separate state, a state for Muslims, has been proved to be hollow. It is not the most populous Muslim nation. It has not been able to accomodate all denominations of Muslims - Sunni Muslims are dominant and others are treated as second grade.
And India has more Muslims than Pakistan and they do not wish to align with Pakistan. This leads one to question the very basis for the creation of Pakistan. Perhaps the people of Pakistan would have been better off as Indian citizens. Perhaps the people of Pakistan might vote to rejoin India, if allowed.
Whatever the people's wish, Pakistan as a state continues with its practice of deploying terrorism as a state policy. What can India do to effectively deal with the situation ? India can and must tackle Pakistan's terror tactics with a heavy hand.
Why does Pakistan use terror to combat India and why fight with India in the first place ? Terror is a cost-effective option. Fools who are ready to die for a never-seen heaven are available a dime a dozen. They only need to be recruited and trained. And Pakistan will not acknowledge their citizenship. So Pakistan can eternally live in denial for all the ghastly acts it commits. Also the Pakistan army is too big for the size of the country. It eats into a giant percentage of the GDP. A private company in this situation would be deemed sick and at least the sick portions would be divested to get it back to health. The Pakistan army needs to find a reason to justify its monstrous existence and needs to keep justifying year after year. After all politicians would only be too glad to clip its wings. So what better than to create and sustain terrorists and have them attack India. It is for the same reason that the army meddles in the internal affairs of Afghanistan and gives sanctuary to various militant groups inimical to its government. That Pakistan is fomenting trouble has been said by no less a person than the Afghan President and that too on many occasions. A restive Afghan border is a good way to ensure its daily bread. A troubled Balochistan is another godsend. This way the army can stay relevant and powerful. It can do anything in the name of security. The internal machinations in Pakistan result in terror attacks on India. Azaadi is only a ruse, a cover that certain sections of the Kashmiri populace will buy.
So what should India do to protect itself ? Well, any action is justified.
First, we should deal ruthlessly with those who swear by violence. No mercy should be shown. It is pertinent to point out here that the late Shri KPS Gill, the former DGP of Punjab, who is largely credited with eliminating militancy in Punjab, was quite ruthless in his approach and phenomenally successful. We need a native Kashmiri in that mould. A man who can think like the terrorists and anticipate their every move. A man who knows what hurts the terrorists most and where. A man who cannot be accused of being an outsider. A man who will not pull punches.
Next we need to ensure development in Kashmir. Economic growth and jobs will be more attractive to the youth than guns. After all, if a young man does not have a job or a constructive way to spend his time, he becomes a prime target for recruitment by terrorists who are also willing to pay handsomely. It is worth noting that after demonitization, there was a lull in the militant activity as there was a squeeze on the supply of cash. No money , no stone throwing, no attacks, no unrest. It is all economics and money. Aazadi is only a slogan. So development is a must. As are schools and colleges which must function normally. Youth engaged usefully and gainfully are less likely to be attracted to militancy.
Then we must isolate Pakistan internationally and make sure the western aid keeps reducing. This will hurt them greatly as Pakistan has a big dependence on foreign aid as its owm economy is in shreds. We should also lobby for sanctions against them.
Every attempt made by terrorists should be dealt with a heavy hand. Take no prisoners. If the Pakistani army targets Indian villages and Indian posts, hit back hard with heavy weaponry. Destroy their posts. Resort to surgical strikes. And for every infiltration attempt by the Pakistani army, India should move in few hundred metres from the LOC.
More proactively, we should engage in eliminating the terrorist leaders living in comfort in Pakistan. The US did that to Osama Bin Laden. Why should we not ?
All these will push up the cost of terrorism for Pakistan and it will cease to be a low cost option over a period of time. Makes economic and military sense, doesn't it ? There is a saying in Hindi - Laaton ke bhoot baaton se nahin mante. Transliterated it means - Ghosts that obey only kicks do not listen to words. If the Pakistan army is asking for a kick in the butt, then why deny them the pleasure ?
Anyone who has been following the news will know what I mean. There is a sickening regularity to it. Pakistan continues to behave like a petulant child that will not listen to anyone. Pakistan is like the typical villain in Indian movies - having lost everthing and having been proved wrong, the villain's only wish is to somehow kill the hero. Pakistan's raison d' etre for existence as a separate state, a state for Muslims, has been proved to be hollow. It is not the most populous Muslim nation. It has not been able to accomodate all denominations of Muslims - Sunni Muslims are dominant and others are treated as second grade.
And India has more Muslims than Pakistan and they do not wish to align with Pakistan. This leads one to question the very basis for the creation of Pakistan. Perhaps the people of Pakistan would have been better off as Indian citizens. Perhaps the people of Pakistan might vote to rejoin India, if allowed.
Whatever the people's wish, Pakistan as a state continues with its practice of deploying terrorism as a state policy. What can India do to effectively deal with the situation ? India can and must tackle Pakistan's terror tactics with a heavy hand.
Why does Pakistan use terror to combat India and why fight with India in the first place ? Terror is a cost-effective option. Fools who are ready to die for a never-seen heaven are available a dime a dozen. They only need to be recruited and trained. And Pakistan will not acknowledge their citizenship. So Pakistan can eternally live in denial for all the ghastly acts it commits. Also the Pakistan army is too big for the size of the country. It eats into a giant percentage of the GDP. A private company in this situation would be deemed sick and at least the sick portions would be divested to get it back to health. The Pakistan army needs to find a reason to justify its monstrous existence and needs to keep justifying year after year. After all politicians would only be too glad to clip its wings. So what better than to create and sustain terrorists and have them attack India. It is for the same reason that the army meddles in the internal affairs of Afghanistan and gives sanctuary to various militant groups inimical to its government. That Pakistan is fomenting trouble has been said by no less a person than the Afghan President and that too on many occasions. A restive Afghan border is a good way to ensure its daily bread. A troubled Balochistan is another godsend. This way the army can stay relevant and powerful. It can do anything in the name of security. The internal machinations in Pakistan result in terror attacks on India. Azaadi is only a ruse, a cover that certain sections of the Kashmiri populace will buy.
So what should India do to protect itself ? Well, any action is justified.
First, we should deal ruthlessly with those who swear by violence. No mercy should be shown. It is pertinent to point out here that the late Shri KPS Gill, the former DGP of Punjab, who is largely credited with eliminating militancy in Punjab, was quite ruthless in his approach and phenomenally successful. We need a native Kashmiri in that mould. A man who can think like the terrorists and anticipate their every move. A man who knows what hurts the terrorists most and where. A man who cannot be accused of being an outsider. A man who will not pull punches.
Next we need to ensure development in Kashmir. Economic growth and jobs will be more attractive to the youth than guns. After all, if a young man does not have a job or a constructive way to spend his time, he becomes a prime target for recruitment by terrorists who are also willing to pay handsomely. It is worth noting that after demonitization, there was a lull in the militant activity as there was a squeeze on the supply of cash. No money , no stone throwing, no attacks, no unrest. It is all economics and money. Aazadi is only a slogan. So development is a must. As are schools and colleges which must function normally. Youth engaged usefully and gainfully are less likely to be attracted to militancy.
Then we must isolate Pakistan internationally and make sure the western aid keeps reducing. This will hurt them greatly as Pakistan has a big dependence on foreign aid as its owm economy is in shreds. We should also lobby for sanctions against them.
Every attempt made by terrorists should be dealt with a heavy hand. Take no prisoners. If the Pakistani army targets Indian villages and Indian posts, hit back hard with heavy weaponry. Destroy their posts. Resort to surgical strikes. And for every infiltration attempt by the Pakistani army, India should move in few hundred metres from the LOC.
More proactively, we should engage in eliminating the terrorist leaders living in comfort in Pakistan. The US did that to Osama Bin Laden. Why should we not ?
All these will push up the cost of terrorism for Pakistan and it will cease to be a low cost option over a period of time. Makes economic and military sense, doesn't it ? There is a saying in Hindi - Laaton ke bhoot baaton se nahin mante. Transliterated it means - Ghosts that obey only kicks do not listen to words. If the Pakistan army is asking for a kick in the butt, then why deny them the pleasure ?